Kathryn Prescott

User rated ★★★(ok feet)

Pirrip
Member since 09/2021

2021-09-10 17:16:52

I agree

BeeDawg
Member since 07/2013
♛3

2021-12-22 04:04:11

I thought it was wikifeet not wikishoe...I want to see feet and toes...

anadermi
Member since 09/2016
♛38

2021-12-22 04:15:11

Are you kidding? There you can see almost 80% of feet

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

podobear
Member since 11/2015
♛4

2020-06-06 15:15:25

LoL I don't think she was ever in TWD , I think it is probably from the movie The Hive or in off chance series Being Human. But The Hive most likely she seems to have some kind of Stigmata.

User rated ★★★(ok feet)

Spankynuts
Member since 09/2010
♛7

2016-06-11 19:17:37

Seems to me the only reason pics like this get posted is to up the rankings (within site) of the poster. Good on ya, bruh, but you're just cluttering up and otherwise awesome site. Believe it or not, dummies, but this site's bandwidth IS limited.

furious
Member since 09/2012
♛8

2016-10-02 08:46:43

I hear what your saying SpankyNuts. I myself love to see woman's feet in a nice pair of sexy heels, but this is not the place for it. Having said that, I have also seen inconsistent application of the site guidelines. I have voiced this before, and trust me it is a losing argument.

It is the personal opinion of the people accepting/rejecting the pictures. These opinions are going to vary widely. I have seen shots of soles that were removed and pictures of toe cleavage (which I like) stay on the site.

What'cha gonna do? I complain, but it doesn't really change much. It is just good to know that others share the same opinion.

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛69

2016-10-02 16:44:59

@Spanky- As you know, I too have been here since 2010 (class of '10 Rulez!) as a registered user, much earlier as an unregistered guest.

It's pretty simple, really. Let em explain:
1) Not our site, not our rules.
2) The written rule is: "If toes, soles or arches are SHOWING, they are allowed"
3) This has been interpreted to an established rule to include *sheer* hosiery (not opaque like tights)
4) Anatomically, there are more parts to 'feet' than 'toes' despite what some here think (see #2, above)
5) There are a wide variety of preference and tastes here including those which include hosiery and shoes, and those are accommodated within the confines of #2, above.

"Bandwidth" is not an issue in this context; "Server Space" might be, but it is basically unlimited (can be expanded on an 'as-needed' basis, and had twice since site inception). So... there's room for all of us here if people will just man up, STFU and skip the pics they don't wish to see. I weed through hundreds of the ones I don't care about to get to a few I do. It's a macrocosm of real life... There's lots of straw and little wheat; lots of mud for a few diamonds. Get over it.

No poll necessary, no long rants needed... this issue is already SETTLED.
If you don't like it, find a barefoot fetish site... there are dozens if not hundred, and if you read the Broadly article, Eli has said this site was specifically designed to be a 'foil' or anti-fetish foot site to those fetish-based usually porn sites.

We have (just for fun/info-- the site content will not be changed) run polls to see if people would prefer a 'bare feet only' type site... they were a pitiful minority here (like 2-3 votes out of 60 or so IIRC), however vocal they are on the wall, and at least 80% of the people I know here (including me) would not be here if that were the case. Bare feet, especially 'natural' ones bore the hell out of me, personally, and apparently I'm by no means alone on that.

https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/celebrity-feet-wikifeet

#soendofstory

furious
Member since 09/2012
♛8

2016-10-02 17:29:57

I like your response @BiB, but I'm afraid this will not be the end of the story. There will be many others asking the same question. And I don't blame them for that matter. Especially since there are inconsistent application of the rules.

But I do like your first rule of WikiFeet. "Not Our Site, Not Our Rules".
The second rule of WikiFeet? "Not Our Site, Not Our Rules".

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛69

2016-10-02 18:19:57

Third rule of wikiFeet: You do not talk about the rules of wikiFeet.

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛69

2016-10-02 18:24:27

See? At least FOUR typos in that post:
>"Let *me explain"
>"...wide variety of *preferences"
>"*has twice since..."
>"*microcosm of real life"

Yeesh. Damn discount English degree from a cowboy college.

furious
Member since 09/2012
♛8

2016-10-02 19:50:55

Yeee Hawww!

Montresor
Member since 03/2014
♛11

2016-10-06 22:36:45

just have say these
http://pics.wikifeet.com/1228204.jpg

MrHoul428
Member since 01/2016
♛1

2016-10-02 07:22:38

They are just as good bare.

Cruzbama8
Member since 04/2015

2015-04-02 19:54:20

Yes it is

Gaelle
Member since 08/2015

2015-08-26 19:24:16

Dear Cruzbama8, you post a great picture (the last one of kathryn prescott) where do you find it ?