Feet rating stats (494 total votes)
340
beautiful
beautiful
94
nice
nice
39
ok
ok
8
bad
bad
13
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info104 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Geo Antoinette's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-05-28 19:41:45 Gorgeous
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-01-28 16:11:54 Gorgeous feet
|
|
2021-08-28 22:05:04 Channel: Bart & Geo
Video: Its Almost There! Time: 2:27 |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-08-12 12:09:02 Wait, let me get this straight (I honestly hope I'm wrong), you gave her one star because in this pic you saw a dude's foot? If so you're not even rating the feet or even the person in general, you're rating how closely the gallery conforms to your idea of what kind of pics the gallery should contain? If so, then yikes...
|
|
2021-08-12 12:26:18 Oh wow, this might be the most unfair rating on WF!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-08-12 13:58:39 What an idiotic reason for 1 star.
|
|
2021-08-12 17:29:53 Now that's a very asinine reason to give her a 1-star rating. Hell, even rating her feet at all based on her proximity to a guy's foot is stupid.
|
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2021-08-12 17:34:38 Y'all don't get it. He was rating the dudes foot 5 stars but her presence dropped it to a one... LOL
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-08-12 17:57:58 I see two sweet soles in view
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-08-12 12:28:37 https://www.wikifeet.com/Julia_Chow
|
|
2021-08-12 07:57:03
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-08-12 00:09:25 FOTD! Nice!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-08-02 13:35:20 Geo is a Beauty for sure with impressive head to toes mini-Amazonian perfection...
#hotcutie |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-08-02 13:53:08 Geo Metro
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-08-02 15:26:21 I don't get it. Go to "affairpost.com" and she's 5'-8". Go to "infofamouspeople.com" and she's 5'-11". Whatever her height, she's a Cutie and head to sweet toes gazeable....
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-07-14 21:25:44 Careful with the blacklight, you might discover secrets untold.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-07-22 21:51:11 Hmmmm, all awesome and thoroughly educational, no doubt....
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-07-27 19:35:39 When will she get promoted up to "Gorgeous feet"??? She really needs it!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-07-27 20:56:27 At this moment, 12% of all pages have a higher rating than hers, and only about the top 0.6% have the "gorgeous" rating.
From a statistical point of view, it looks very unlikely to happen anytime soon. |
|
2016-07-27 21:31:22 the gorgeous not go by just rating tho, mucho other factor he say
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2016-07-27 22:22:16 @sturyo:where can I find these statistics?
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-07-28 08:40:16 There seems to be some hidden site rating score that is calculated from the individual user ratings. The actual score numbers and the exact algorithm how they're calculated aren't publicly known (presumably to discourage manipulation).
However, there is a list of celebrities sorted by that rating score: http://www.wikifeet.com/celebs?sort=rating (i.e. sorted by site rating) The position of a celebrity in this list divided by the total number of celebrities on the site gives you the percentage score I mentioned above. I calculate the position as 10*(page_number) + position_on_page. Example (at the time of this post, the exact numbers will change over time): There are a total of 45913 celebrities at this moment. If you click through the list, you will find Geo Antoinette on page 556 (at position 5569: http://www.wikifeet.com/celebs?sort=rating&page=556) --> 5569/45913 * 100% = 12.1% (approx.) At this time, there are 279 celebrities with a gorgeous rating (it changes on page 27: http://www.wikifeet.com/celebs?sort=rating&page=27) --> 279/45913 * 100% = 0.61% (approx.) |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-07-28 08:51:32 Addendum: The calculation itself is very simple. But of course it's a drag to click through the list just to find the position of one celebrity. I only did it this one time to make a point.
It would be easy for the site developer to show the ranking position on each celebrity's page directly, but he doesn't seem to want to do that (or maybe he just hasn't thought of it). |
|
2016-07-28 09:52:42 Not bad @sturyo. But there are a number of other analytics factors that play into the equation. Close enough to say, "good advice" though. +1
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2016-07-29 22:52:19 @sturyo: Thank you for explanation.
|
|
2018-02-06 02:04:34 If the tips of her toes werent all bulbous and wider than the rest of her toe, I suspect she would move up a notch. I bet that holds her back tho. At least on my scale, it takes her from 5 to a 4.
|
