Feet rating stats (24 total votes)
8
beautiful
beautiful
6
nice
nice
7
ok
ok
1
bad
bad
2
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (nice feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info10 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Elvina Beck's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
2019-02-24 04:22:33 We have a standing no sock RULE
|
|
2019-02-24 14:59:58 In that case, my bad. Now I know.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2019-02-23 20:23:47 Whoever reported some pictures as no feet showing please don't do that. They're indeed feet and no hands and we sure don't have the same taste regarding them. There are the ones who like barefoot and socks and ones who like only barefoot. In both cases they show clearly the foot not like they have shoes. No one size fits all. Don't impose barefoot-centric views, thanks.
|
|
2019-02-23 21:05:37 I totally agree with you.
|
|
2019-02-23 21:40:30 The site guidelines state that shoes and socks isn't what WIkifeet is all about and these should be shown as no feet showing.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2019-02-23 23:04:24 It’s not about “imposing barefoot centric views”. The rules of this site literally state that socks and shoes do not count as they don’t display toes, arch, or soles. This isn’t wikisock or wikishoe.
|
