Feet rating stats (244 total votes)
148
beautiful
beautiful
48
nice
nice
29
ok
ok
15
bad
bad
4
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info70 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Anna Ewers's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
2017-05-20 07:41:38 I think a clarification about what constitutes "adult content" is much needed. A beautiful black and white shot by Peter Lindbergh from a Vogue editorial, showing no genitals, no nipples, no sexual attitude whatsoever, has been removed from the gallery. Why, if I may ask?
|
|
2017-05-23 08:12:37 Really, a clearer definition of "adult content" would be very useful and appreciated. When an artistic nude picture without any sexual connotation and showing no private parts at all is deleted, and an ugly porn picture showing a guy with an obvious boner, although he's wearing his trunks, is not (it's still there, in another gallery I had the misfortune to spot), it is quite confusing and makes everything much less fun.
|
|
2017-06-02 22:39:14 Only safe-for-work content is allowed.. & some nude or "edgy" poses are=nsfw a/c and therefore in violation of the sponsor's guidelines (who run $ this site)
|
|
2017-06-02 23:33:27 Yeah. I liked it a lil better, when the "raunch" was allowed... to an extent.
|
|
2018-10-13 08:27:44 Good comments. I do think it is and will always involve subjective criteria and that most nebulous thing, taste. But even so, it shouldn't be so hard. Not hard, that is, for the admins of a site like this to apply. Hard to make work when users are applying them, because most of them will make up their own rules and apply those, actual criteria be damned.
So I hate to say it, but one boss for these decisions, versus a democracy, is probably the only thing that could ensure consistency and clarity. |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2018-10-13 06:06:21 3785774 and 3785775 are from the video available at https://www.liujo.com/int/corporate/denim/denim-fit-guide/
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2018-10-13 06:09:17 😍🔥
|
|
2018-03-02 15:50:50 Wrong person in 3189057, 3243509, and 3243510: that's Raquel Zimmermann.
|
|
2017-05-20 06:41:26 Justified
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2017-07-17 15:13:38 You're right ! sorry for the duplicates
|
|
2015-04-28 23:13:58 @Grik, Anna Ewers is the girl on the right, no idea who her buddy is though.
|
|
2016-04-19 14:55:16 Juliana schurig
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-04-19 15:32:08 @Grik ...compliment for the compliment !
|
|
2016-04-05 23:34:21 For anyone of you who like very sandy feet - run a Google image search for her "Ryan McGinley Photoshoot for Stern Mode #12 Spring / Summer 2016"
and a little bit(s) extra too ;) |
|
2015-04-28 23:14:39 It's all good @ilf ;)
|
